Passé composé vs imparfait: how French picks its past
English has one simple past and gets by. French has two, and "I ate" can be either one depending on what you mean. Here is the one question that decides it, then enough practice to make the choice automatic.
Updated on
The short answer
Ask one question of the verb: is it telling me what was going on, or what happened? What was going on, the scene, the habit, the state of things, takes the imparfait: il faisait beau, it was nice out. What happened, the event that moves the story one step, takes the passé composé: nous sommes partis, we left. How long ago it was does not matter, and how long it lasted barely matters. A ten-year war can be passé composé if you report it as a finished event, and a two-second glance can be imparfait if it is the backdrop for something else.
If you are coming from English, the confusing part is that English hides this choice. “I ate” is one form; French makes you decide whether you mean je mangeais
Before the grammar, here is what the language sounds like from a native speaker:
CamilleNative speaker (Wikitongues)
Each card below is a French sentence with one verb missing. Type it, reveal the answer, and read what every word in the sentence is doing.
Building block 1: the passé composé with avoir
The passé composé is two words: a helper verb in the present, usually avoir, plus the past participle. Il a fait, he made; tu as fini, you finished. The helper carries the person (a, as, avons, ont), the participle carries the meaning.
He made a cake. Faire has the irregular participle fait. The helper a says “he”.
He made a chocolate cake.
You finished early. A regular -ir verb: finir becomes fini. The helper as says “you”, informal.
You finished your work very early.
Informal singular 'you'.
Two more, because the participle is where most of the memorising lives. Lire gives lu, voir gives vu, and small words like déjà, already, slip in between the helper and the participle:
He has already read this book.
They have already seen this movie.
Feminine plural 'they'.
Building block 2: être or avoir?
A short list of verbs, mostly about coming, going and changing state, take être as their helper instead of avoir: elle est allée, she went, not “elle a allé”. Every reflexive verb takes être too: ils se sont levés, they got up.
She went to the market. Aller is the most common être verb.
Yesterday, she went to the market.
They got up early. The se in front of the verb is enough to force être.
This morning, they woke up very early.
Here is the detail that separates a memorised list from an understood one. A handful of verbs, sortir, monter, descendre, passer, switch helpers depending on whether they have an object. Same verb, same participle, two sentences:
He took out the trash. Sortir with an object, la poubelle, takes avoir.
This morning, he took out the trash.
He went out with his friends. Sortir with no object, just going out, takes être.
Last night, he went out with his friends.
The same thing happens with monter: carry the suitcases up, nous avons monté les valises, but go upstairs, nous sommes montés.
We carried the suitcases up to the bedroom.
Building block 3: making the participle agree
With être, the participle behaves like an adjective and agrees with the subject: elles sont parties, with the feminine plural ending -es. With avoir, it usually does not agree at all, with one famous exception: when the thing acted on comes before the verb, as in les pommes que Paul a mangées, the apples that Paul ate.
They (women) left. Être helper, feminine plural subject, so parties.
They left this morning at eight o'clock.
The subject is feminine plural.
The apples that Paul ate. Avoir helper, but les pommes comes first, so mangées.
The apples that Paul ate were very good.
Reflexives look like they should always agree, since they take être, but they follow the avoir rule underneath: agreement only when the se is the thing acted on. Elles se sont lavées, they washed themselves, agrees. Ils se sont parlé, they spoke to each other, does not, because you speak to someone.
They washed themselves with this new soap.
Reflexive pronoun is a direct object; subject is feminine plural.
They spoke to each other on the phone for an hour.
You will not hear most of these endings, since parti
Building block 4: the imparfait
The imparfait is one word and almost perfectly regular. Take the nous form of the present, drop -ons, add -ais, -ais, -ait, -ions, -iez, -aient. Nous finissons gives the stem finiss-, so nous finissions, we used to finish. Only être refuses the pattern, with the stem ét-.
He used to eat an apple every morning. A habit: chaque matin is the giveaway.
He used to eat an apple every morning.
We always finished our homework first. Toujours, always, points the same way.
We always finished our homework before playing.
Verbs in -cer and -ger keep their soft sound with a spelling tweak: commencer becomes commençaient, manger becomes mangeait.
They used to start their day very early.
Feminine plural 'they'.
The choice itself
Now the part the whole page is named after. With both tenses in hand, most sentences fall into one of three shapes.
The interruption. Something was going on (imparfait), and something else happened (passé composé). This is the shape every French course drills, because it puts both tenses in one sentence and shows exactly how they divide the work.
I was watching a movie when the phone rang.
Je regardais is the film playing in the background; a sonné is the ring that cuts in. Flip the tenses and the sentence goes strange: “I watched a film when the phone was ringing” makes the ringing the backdrop for a whole film.
It was beautiful weather when we left.
The weather is the classic scene-setter. Il faisait beau is not an event, it is the conditions; nous sommes partis is what occurred inside them.
The plan that fell through. The imparfait can hold an expectation, and the passé composé what actually took place.
He was supposed to come at eight o'clock, but something came up.
Il devait venir, he was supposed to come, is a state of expectation; il a eu un empêchement, something came up, is the event that broke it.
The verbs that change meaning. A few verbs mean a state in the imparfait and an event in the passé composé, and English translates them with two different words. Savoir: il savait, he knew, but il a su, he found out. Vouloir: il voulait, he wanted, but il a voulu, he tried to, or decided to.
He only found out yesterday. Croyait is the state he was in; a su is the moment the truth landed.
Paul thought he knew the truth, but he only found out the truth yesterday.
Use the correct participle for the past realization (passé composé).
He did not want to go, but he ended up accepting. Ne voulait pas is how he felt; a fini par accepter is what he did.
Paul didn't want to go, but he ended up accepting.
Three shortcuts to avoid
- “Imparfait for long things, passé composé for short things” is wrong often enough to hurt you. Il a vécu dix ans à Paris, he lived ten years in Paris, is passé composé because it is reported as one finished chapter. Length is not the question; the role in the story is.
- “Imparfait means was -ing” catches the interruption pattern and misses the habits and the states. Il mangeait une pomme chaque matin is not “he was eating an apple every morning”; it is “he used to”.
- Time words help but do not decide. Hier, yesterday, usually announces a passé composé, and chaque matin an imparfait, yet hier, il faisait beau is a perfectly good sentence: yesterday is when the scene took place, and the weather is still scenery.
The drill below gives you five sentences and two forms each. You will definitely get the interruptions right after this page; the meaning-change verbs are the ones to watch.
Practice
Pick the past
Each sentence needs one verb in the passé composé or the imparfait. Ask the question first, then choose. Check your answer and read why.
See the explained solutions without taking the exercise
- regardaisThe film is the background the phone call cuts into, so it takes the imparfait, regardais. The interruption, a sonné, is the passé composé.
- sommes partisFaisait beau is the setting, so leaving is the event that happens inside it, sommes partis in the passé composé. Note the auxiliary, être, because partir is a verb of movement.
- devaitDevait in the imparfait describes what was expected, a plan hanging in the air. A dû would mean he actually had to, a completed obligation, which is not what the sentence says.
- a suSavoir changes meaning with the tense. Savait would be "he knew", a state; a su is "he found out", the moment the knowledge arrived. Seulement hier points at that moment.
- mangeaitChaque matin makes it a habit, and habits in the past take the imparfait, mangeait. A mangé would report one apple on one occasion.
Keep choosing between the two pasts in Panglotive
Open the French conjugation tree with the imparfait / passé composé node already targeted, and practise the choice on sentences at your level, with the analysis of every verb.
Further reading
- Passé composé · Wikipedia
- Imperfect · Wikipedia